Quadro FX 570M vs Radeon 3000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 570M is positioned at rank #404 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 570M

#389

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

73865%

#404

Quadro FX 570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#405

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

100%

#406

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

100%

#407

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

90%

#408

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

85%

#410

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

80%

#411

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

80%

#413

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

60%

#416

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

50%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

45%

#418

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

40%

#419

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

40%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 3000 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon 3000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 570M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 570M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3000.

Insight	Quadro FX 570M	Radeon 3000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 570M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 570M Benchmark Check

Radeon 3000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 570M and Radeon 3000

Quadro FX 570M

The Quadro FX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon 3000

The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 570M scores 99 and the Radeon 3000 reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 570M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 570M) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570M) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000).

Feature	Quadro FX 570M	Radeon 3000
G3D Mark Score	99+1%	98
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	55 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	240	512+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+100%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 570M	Radeon 3000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 570M) vs 512 KB (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 570M	Radeon 3000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 570M draws 189W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 570M) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.