
Quadro FX 570M
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 3400/4400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 570M is positioned at rank 404 and the Quadro FX 3400/4400 is on rank 421, so the Quadro FX 570M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 570M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3400/4400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 570M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 570M | Quadro FX 3400/4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 3400/4400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 570M and Quadro FX 3400/4400

Quadro FX 570M
The Quadro FX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro FX 3400/4400
The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 570M scores 99 versus the Quadro FX 3400/4400's 104 — the Quadro FX 3400/4400 leads by 5.1%. The Quadro FX 570M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 3400/4400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 570M) vs 192 (Quadro FX 3400/4400). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570M) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3400/4400).
| Feature | Quadro FX 570M | Quadro FX 3400/4400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 99 | 104+5% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+25% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+35% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 570M | Quadro FX 3400/4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 570M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3400/4400 has 256 MB. The Quadro FX 570M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 570M) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 3400/4400) — the Quadro FX 570M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 570M | Quadro FX 3400/4400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 570M draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 3400/4400's 150W — a 23% difference. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 570M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3400/4400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 570M | Quadro FX 3400/4400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 150W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.7+40% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















