Quadro FX 570M vs Quadro FX 4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 570M is positioned at rank 404 and the Quadro FX 4000 is on rank 423, so the Quadro FX 570M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 570M

#389

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

73865%

#404

Quadro FX 570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#405

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

100%

#406

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

100%

#407

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

90%

#408

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

85%

#410

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

80%

#411

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

80%

#413

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

60%

#416

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

50%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

45%

#418

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

40%

#419

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

40%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4000

#408

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

295460%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

100%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

80%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

40%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

20%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 570M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 570M	Quadro FX 4000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 570M Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 4000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 570M and Quadro FX 4000

Quadro FX 570M

The Quadro FX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro FX 4000

The Quadro FX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 101 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 570M scores 99 and the Quadro FX 4000 reaches 101 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 570M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 4000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 570M) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4000). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570M) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4000).

Feature	Quadro FX 570M	Quadro FX 4000
G3D Mark Score	99	101+2%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	240+25%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS+35%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	80+25%	64
L2 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 570M	Quadro FX 4000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 570M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4000 has 256 MB. The Quadro FX 570M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 570M) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4000) — the Quadro FX 570M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 570M	Quadro FX 4000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 570M draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 4000's 150W — a 23% difference. The Quadro FX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 570M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.