
GeForce 8400M GS vs Quadro FX 570M

GeForce 8400M GS
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 570M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400M GS is positioned at rank 637 and the Quadro FX 570M is on rank 404, so the Quadro FX 570M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M GS
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 570M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 8400M GS is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The GeForce 8400M GS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 570M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8400M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 570M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 8400M GS | Quadro FX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 8400M GS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400M GS and Quadro FX 570M

GeForce 8400M GS
The GeForce 8400M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.

Quadro FX 570M
The Quadro FX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400M GS scores 104 versus the Quadro FX 570M's 99 — the GeForce 8400M GS leads by 5.1%. The GeForce 8400M GS is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 570M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 240 (Quadro FX 570M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570M).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Quadro FX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 104+5% | 99 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS+39% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 80+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Quadro FX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400M GS comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 570M has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 570M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 570M) — the GeForce 8400M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Quadro FX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400M GS draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 570M's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 8400M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 570M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Quadro FX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-83% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2+540% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8400M GS is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Quadro FX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GT200B |
| Release | March 12 2014 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #854 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















