GeForce 8400M G
VS
GeForce 8400M GS

GeForce 8400M G vs GeForce 8400M GS

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M G

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M GS

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400M G is positioned at rank 635 and the GeForce 8400M GS is on rank 637, so the GeForce 8400M G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M G

#624
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
5170%
#626
4687%
#627
4674%
#631
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4250%
#632
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4221%
#634
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
100%
#635
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#636
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
99%
#637
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#638
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
98%
#639
GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
#640
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#641
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
95%
#642
94%
#643
GeForce 9300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
93%
#644
GeForce 9500 GS
MSRP: $110|Avg: $10
93%
#645
91%
#646
Mobility Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#647
GeForce 8500 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
90%
#648
GeForce 9500 GT
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
90%
#649
Mobility Radeon X1600
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M GS

#627
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
5220%
#629
4732%
#630
4719%
#634
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4291%
#635
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4262%
#637
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#638
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#639
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
99%
#640
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#641
GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
98%
#642
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#643
95%
#644
GeForce 9500 GS
MSRP: $110|Avg: $10
94%
#645
GeForce 9300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
94%
#646
92%
#647
GeForce 9500 GT
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
91%
#648
Mobility Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
#649
GeForce 8500 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
91%
#650
Mobility Radeon X1600
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
#651
Radeon HD 3650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
90%
#652
GeForce 9400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 8400M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8400M GS.

InsightGeForce 8400M GGeForce 8400M GS
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 8400M G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8400M G holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 8400M GGeForce 8400M GS
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400M G and GeForce 8400M GS

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M G

The GeForce 8400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M GS

The GeForce 8400M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400M G scores 105 and the GeForce 8400M GS reaches 104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8400M GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 384 (GeForce 8400M GS). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M G) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GS). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce 8400M GS
G3D Mark Score
105
104
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
0.8632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1124 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
16
16
L1 Cache
192 KB
192 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce 8400M GS
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce 8400M GS
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 10_0 (GeForce 8400M GS). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce 8400M GS
DirectX
11.1+11%
10_0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce 8400M G) vs PureVideo (GeForce 8400M GS). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400M G) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9 (GeForce 8400M GS).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce 8400M GS
Encoder
PureVideo HD
PureVideo
Decoder
PureVideo HD
PureVideo
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400M G draws 33W versus the GeForce 8400M GS's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 8400M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M G) vs 350W (GeForce 8400M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce 8400M GS
TDP
33W
33W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
3.2
3.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8400M G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 8400M GS launched at $50 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 5.2 (GeForce 8400M GS) — the GeForce 8400M G offers 1.9% better value.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce 8400M GS
MSRP
$50
$50
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$20
Performance per Dollar
5.3+2%
5.2
Codename
GM108
GM108
Release
March 12 2014
March 12 2014
Ranking
#854
#854