
GeForce 8400M G

GeForce GT 320M
GeForce 8400M G vs GeForce GT 320M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400M G vs GeForce GT 320M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8400M G vs GeForce GT 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400M G
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 320M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GT 320M
2017Why buy it
- ✅48.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 128 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400M G vs GeForce GT 320M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400M G
The GeForce 8400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

GeForce GT 320M
The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400M G scores 105 versus the GeForce GT 320M's 114 — the GeForce GT 320M leads by 8.6%. The GeForce 8400M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 320M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 384 (GeForce GT 320M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M G) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105 | 114+9% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1468 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+33% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400M G has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 320M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 320M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M G and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M G) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 320M) — the GeForce 8400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 1 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 11.1 (FL10_1) (GeForce GT 320M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 11.1 (FL10_1) |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce 8400M G) vs VP4 (GeForce GT 320M). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400M G) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 320M).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400M G draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 320M's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M G) vs 350W (GeForce GT 320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 3.8+19% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 320M (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GP108 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #854 | #641 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














