CPU
GPU
GeForce 8400M G
Popular choices:
GeForce 9300 GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400M G is positioned at rank 635 and the GeForce 9300 GE is on rank 501, so the GeForce 9300 GE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M G
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300 GE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8400M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9300 GE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8400M G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8400M G holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 28.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+28.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400M G and GeForce 9300 GE
GeForce 8400M G
The GeForce 8400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.
GeForce 9300 GE
The GeForce 9300 GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8400M G scores 105 and the GeForce 9300 GE reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9300 GE uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 384 (GeForce 9300 GE). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M G) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 GE). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 941 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105+3% | 102 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS+19% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+19% | 941 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400M G comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9300 GE has 256 MB. The GeForce 9300 GE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300 GE). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1+11% | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce 8400M G) vs No (GeForce 9300 GE). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400M G) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9300 GE).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400M G draws 33W versus the GeForce 9300 GE's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 9300 GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M G) vs 350W (GeForce 9300 GE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 106mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2+3% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8400M G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 9300 GE launched at $23 and now averages $25. The GeForce 8400M G costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 4.1 (GeForce 9300 GE) — the GeForce 8400M G offers 29.3% better value. The GeForce 9300 GE is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $23-54% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-20% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3+29% | 4.1 |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #854 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8400M G and GeForce 9300 GE
