
GeForce 8400M G

Radeon HD 4270
GeForce 8400M G vs Radeon HD 4270 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400M G vs Radeon HD 4270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Civilization VI

Dead by Daylight
GeForce 8400M G vs Radeon HD 4270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400M G
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 4270
2008Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400M G vs Radeon HD 4270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400M G
The GeForce 8400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

Radeon HD 4270
The Radeon HD 4270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 110 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8400M G scores 105 and the Radeon HD 4270 reaches 110 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400M G is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4270 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4270). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M G) vs 1.2 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4270).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105 | 110+5% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.2 TFLOPS+39% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 40+150% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8400M G gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4270 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400M G has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4270 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 4270 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M G and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4270. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M G) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4270) — the GeForce 8400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4270). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1+10% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400M G) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 4270).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400M G draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 4270's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 8400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M G) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4270). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2+357% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400M G came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 4270 launched at $50. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 2.2 (Radeon HD 4270) — the Radeon HD 4270 offers 4.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8400M G (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 2.2+5% |
| Codename | GM108 | RV770 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #854 | #784 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














