GeForce 8400M GS
Radeon X1950 GT
GeForce 8400M GS vs Radeon X1950 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400M GS vs Radeon X1950 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8400M GS vs Radeon X1950 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400M GS
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 174.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 335W, a 302W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon X1950 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon X1950 GT
2022Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅GeForce 8400M GS is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1950 GT is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌180% HIGHER MSRP$140 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌915.2% higher power demand at 335W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400M GS vs Radeon X1950 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 8400M GS
The GeForce 8400M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.
Radeon X1950 GT
The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8400M GS scores 104 and the Radeon X1950 GT reaches 106 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400M GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon X1950 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2324 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 104 | 106+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 5120+1233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 23.8 TFLOPS+2657% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 2324 MHz+107% |
| ROPs | 8 | 128+1500% |
| TMUs | 16 | 320+1900% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1 MB+426% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8400M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1950 GT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400M GS has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1950 GT carries 512 MB. Radeon X1950 GT gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GS and 64-bit on the Radeon X1950 GT. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Radeon X1950 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1950 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0+11% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo (GeForce 8400M GS) vs Avivo (Radeon X1950 GT). Decoder: PureVideo vs Avivo.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo | Avivo |
| Decoder | PureVideo | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400M GS draws 33W versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 335W — a 164.1% difference. The GeForce 8400M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 350W (Radeon X1950 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-90% | 335W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 230mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2+967% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400M GS came in at $50, while the Radeon X1950 GT launched at $140. On MSRP, GeForce 8400M GS was 64.3% cheaper ($90 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (GeForce 8400M GS) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1950 GT) — the GeForce 8400M GS offers 162.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1950 GT (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GS | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-64% | $140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1+163% | 0.8 |
| Codename | GM108 | Navi 21 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #854 | #25 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8400M GS and Radeon X1950 GT
