CPU
GPU
GeForce 8300
Popular choices:
GeForce 8400M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8300 is positioned at rank 640 and the GeForce 8400M GS is on rank 637, so the GeForce 8400M GS offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8400M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 8300 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 8300 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8400M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8400M GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 154.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8300 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+154.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8300 and GeForce 8400M GS
GeForce 8300
The GeForce 8300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.
GeForce 8400M GS
The GeForce 8400M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8300 scores 102 and the GeForce 8400M GS reaches 104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8300 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8400M GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8300) vs 384 (GeForce 8400M GS). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GS). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 102 | 104+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 0.8632 TFLOPS+47% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+2% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8300 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8400M GS has 128 MB. The GeForce 8300 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8300) vs 10_0 (GeForce 8400M GS). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10_0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8300) vs PureVideo (GeForce 8400M GS). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8300) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9 (GeForce 8400M GS).
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | PureVideo |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8300 draws 33W versus the GeForce 8400M GS's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 8400M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8300) vs 350W (GeForce 8400M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1 | 3.2+3% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8300 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce 8400M GS launched at $50 and now averages $20. The GeForce 8400M GS costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (GeForce 8300) vs 5.2 (GeForce 8400M GS) — the GeForce 8400M GS offers 160% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $20-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 5.2+160% |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #832 | #854 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8300 and GeForce 8400M GS
