
GeForce 8300

GeForce Go 6800
GeForce 8300 vs GeForce Go 6800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8300 vs GeForce Go 6800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8300 vs GeForce Go 6800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8300
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 195W, a 162W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce Go 6800
2012Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌490.9% higher power demand at 195W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8300 vs GeForce Go 6800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8300
The GeForce 8300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

GeForce Go 6800
The GeForce Go 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8300 scores 102 and the GeForce Go 6800 reaches 106 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8300 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 6800 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8300) vs 1,536 (GeForce Go 6800). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300) vs 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6800). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1058 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 102 | 106+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1536+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 3.25 TFLOPS+452% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+9% | 1058 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 128+700% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8300 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6800 carries 128 MB. GeForce 8300 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8300 and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6800. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8300) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce Go 6800) — the GeForce 8300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8300) vs 10.0 (GeForce Go 6800). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8300) vs No (GeForce Go 6800). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6800).
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8300 draws 33W versus the GeForce Go 6800's 195W — a 142.1% difference. The GeForce 8300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8300) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6800). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-83% | 195W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1+520% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 8300 (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GK104 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #832 | #410 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














