Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon HD 6290

NVIDIA

Quadro FX Go1400

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6290

2011Core: 830 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon HD 6290 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon HD 6290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon HD 6290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX Go1400

2008

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 375W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6290 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6290

2011

Why buy it

  • 2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% higher power demand at 375W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6290 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (105 vs 102), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX Go1400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6290 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6290 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX Go1400 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon HD 6290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX Go1400

The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

AMD

Radeon HD 6290

The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX Go1400 scores 102 and the Radeon HD 6290 reaches 105 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6290 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290).

FeatureQuadro FX Go1400Radeon HD 6290
G3D Mark Score
102
105+3%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
1536 ×2+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4623 TFLOPS
2.55 TFLOPS ×2+452%
ROPs
24
32 ×2+33%
TMUs
64
96 ×2+50%
L2 Cache
192 KB
512 KB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX Go1400Radeon HD 6290
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX Go1400 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX Go1400 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6290. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6290) — the Radeon HD 6290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX Go1400Radeon HD 6290
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
192 KB
512 KB+167%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX Go1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6290's 375W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro FX Go1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX Go1400Radeon HD 6290
TDP
150W-60%
375W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
0.7+133%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6290 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX Go1400Radeon HD 6290
MSRP
$50
Codename
GT200B
Antilles
Release
November 11 2008
March 8 2011
Ranking
#884
#583

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.