
Quadro FX Go1400

Radeon HD 6290
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon HD 6290 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon HD 6290 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon HD 6290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX Go1400
2008Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 375W, a 225W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6290 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6290
2011Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 375W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon HD 6290 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX Go1400
The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon HD 6290
The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX Go1400 scores 102 and the Radeon HD 6290 reaches 105 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6290 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290).
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 102 | 105+3% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1536 ×2+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+452% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX Go1400 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX Go1400 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6290. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6290) — the Radeon HD 6290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX Go1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6290's 375W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro FX Go1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-60% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7+133% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon HD 6290 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon HD 6290 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Codename | GT200B | Antilles |
| Release | November 11 2008 | March 8 2011 |
| Ranking | #884 | #583 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














