GeForce Go 6800 vs Quadro FX Go1400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6800 vs Quadro FX Go1400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 6800 vs Quadro FX Go1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6800

2012

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌30% higher power demand at 195W vs 150W.

Quadro FX Go1400

2008

Why buy it

✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 195W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce Go 6800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.9% in PassMark G3D (106 vs 102), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce Go 6800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce Go 6800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce Go 6800 vs Quadro FX Go1400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 6800

The GeForce Go 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro FX Go1400

The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 6800 scores 106 and the Quadro FX Go1400 reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6800 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX Go1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 6800) vs 192 (Quadro FX Go1400). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6800) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400).

Feature	GeForce Go 6800	Quadro FX Go1400
G3D Mark Score	106+4%	102
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1536+700%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.25 TFLOPS+603%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	128+100%	64
L2 Cache	512 KB+167%	192 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 6800 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX Go1400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce Go 6800	Quadro FX Go1400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6800 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX Go1400 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX Go1400 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6800 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX Go1400. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce Go 6800) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX Go1400) — the GeForce Go 6800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce Go 6800	Quadro FX Go1400
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	4 GB+3100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+167%	192 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6800 draws 195W versus the Quadro FX Go1400's 150W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro FX Go1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6800) vs 350W (Quadro FX Go1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.