Mobility Radeon X1700 vs Quadro FX Go1400

AMD

Mobility Radeon X1700

2010Core: 700 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX Go1400

2008Core: 602 MHz

Mobility Radeon X1700 vs Quadro FX Go1400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon X1700 vs Quadro FX Go1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon X1700

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX Go1400

2008

Why buy it

  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon X1700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (105 vs 102), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon X1700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon X1700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Mobility Radeon X1700 vs Quadro FX Go1400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon X1700

The Mobility Radeon X1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX Go1400

The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon X1700 scores 105 and the Quadro FX Go1400 reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1700 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX Go1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 192 (Quadro FX Go1400). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400).

FeatureMobility Radeon X1700Quadro FX Go1400
G3D Mark Score
105+3%
102
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
800+317%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+142%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
24+50%
TMUs
40
64+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon X1700Quadro FX Go1400
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon X1700 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX Go1400 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX Go1400 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1700 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX Go1400. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX Go1400) — the Mobility Radeon X1700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon X1700Quadro FX Go1400
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
4 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon X1700 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX Go1400's 150W — a 100% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 350W (Quadro FX Go1400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon X1700Quadro FX Go1400
TDP
50W-67%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
2.1+200%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Mobility Radeon X1700 (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureMobility Radeon X1700Quadro FX Go1400
MSRP
$49
Codename
Broadway
GT200B
Release
January 7 2010
November 11 2008
Ranking
#846
#884

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.