GeForce GT 320M vs Mobility Radeon X1700

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon X1700

2010Core: 700 MHz

GeForce GT 320M vs Mobility Radeon X1700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 320M vs Mobility Radeon X1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 320M

2017

Why buy it

  • +8.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Mobility Radeon X1700

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (105 vs 114).
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 320M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.6% in PassMark G3D (114 vs 105), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon X1700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon X1700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 320M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 320M vs Mobility Radeon X1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Mobility Radeon X1700

The Mobility Radeon X1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 320M scores 114 versus the Mobility Radeon X1700's 105 — the GeForce GT 320M leads by 8.6%. The GeForce GT 320M is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon X1700 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1700). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1700).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon X1700
G3D Mark Score
114+9%
105
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 2
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
144 KB+80%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon X1700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon X1700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 320M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1700 carries 256 MB. GeForce GT 320M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320M and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1700. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 320M) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1700) — the GeForce GT 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon X1700
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+300%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_1) (GeForce GT 320M) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1700). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon X1700
DirectX
11.1 (FL10_1)+23%
9.0c
OpenGL
3.3+65%
2.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VP4 (GeForce GT 320M) vs Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1700). Decoder: VP4 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 320M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1700).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon X1700
Encoder
VP4
Avivo
Decoder
VP4
Avivo
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 320M draws 30W versus the Mobility Radeon X1700's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 320M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon X1700
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
3.8+81%
2.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 320M (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon X1700
MSRP
$49
Codename
GP108
Broadway
Release
May 17 2017
January 7 2010
Ranking
#641
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.