GeForce 9300M GS vs GeForce GT 320M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300M GS vs GeForce GT 320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300M GS vs GeForce GT 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300M GS

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GT 320M

2017

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 9300M GS is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (118 vs 114), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9300M GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9300M GS makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 9300M GS vs GeForce GT 320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9300M GS

The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

GeForce GT 320M

The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300M GS scores 118 and the GeForce GT 320M reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300M GS is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 320M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 384 (GeForce GT 320M). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	GeForce GT 320M
G3D Mark Score	118+4%	114
Architecture	Maxwell	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	1.127 TFLOPS+167%
Boost Clock	549 MHz	1468 MHz+167%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	192 KB+33%	144 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	GeForce GT 320M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9300M GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 320M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 320M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300M GS and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 320M) — the GeForce 9300M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	GeForce GT 320M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	1 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 11.1 (FL10_1) (GeForce GT 320M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	GeForce GT 320M
DirectX	10.0	11.1 (FL10_1)+11%
Vulkan	None	N/A
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9300M GS) vs VP4 (GeForce GT 320M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 320M).

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	GeForce GT 320M
Encoder	No	VP4
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300M GS draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 320M's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 350W (GeForce GT 320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	GeForce GT 320M
TDP	33W	30W-9%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	3.6	3.8+6%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 320M (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	GeForce GT 320M
MSRP	$100	—
Codename	GM108	GP108
Release	March 13 2015	May 17 2017
Ranking	#880	#641

Search GeForce 9300M GS on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 320M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.