GeForce 315M
VS
GeForce 9300M GS

GeForce 315M vs GeForce 9300M GS

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9300M GS

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 315M is positioned at rank 535 and the GeForce 9300M GS is on rank 686, so the GeForce 315M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 315M

#525
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2835%
#527
2570%
#528
2563%
#532
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2331%
#533
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2315%
#535
GeForce 315M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#536
100%
#538
99%
#539
Radeon R7 M445
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#540
Mobility Radeon HD 540v
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#541
98%
#542
97%
#543
Radeon R9 M275
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#544
Radeon HD 7640G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#545
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#546
96%
#547
96%
#548
Radeon R5 M335
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#549
95%
#550
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300M GS

#676
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
9201%
#678
8341%
#679
8319%
#683
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
7564%
#684
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
7513%
#686
GeForce 9300M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#687
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $1
97%
#688
GeForce 6150 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
93%
#689
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
90%
#690
GeForce 9450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
89%
#691
GeForce 9800 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $75
86%
#692
GeForce 7900 GS
MSRP: $259|Avg: $50
86%
#693
MOBILITY RADEON X600
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
85%
#694
Mobility Radeon X2300
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
83%
#695
Mobility Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
83%
#696
Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
83%
#697
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $12
81%
#698
GeForce 8600 GTS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $35
79%
#699
GeForce 8800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $50
79%
#700
Mobility Radeon HD 3450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
77%
#701
GeForce 8800 GTS
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9300M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 315M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Leading raw performance (+2.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 9300M GS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 315M and GeForce 9300M GS

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

The GeForce 315M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300M GS

The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 315M scores 115 and the GeForce 9300M GS reaches 118 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 315M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9300M GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 315M) vs 384 (GeForce 9300M GS). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 315M) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 549 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
G3D Mark Score
115
118+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+210%
0.4216 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1020 MHz+86%
549 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+67%
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 315M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9300M GS has 256 MB. The GeForce 315M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 315M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) — the GeForce 315M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 315M) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300M GS). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
DirectX
10.1
10.0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 315M) vs No (GeForce 9300M GS). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 315M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M GS).

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 315M draws 75W versus the GeForce 9300M GS's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 315M) vs 350W (GeForce 9300M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
TDP
75W
33W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
1.5
3.6+140%