GeForce 315M vs GeForce 9300M GS

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9300M GS

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 315M vs GeForce 9300M GS Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 315M vs GeForce 9300M GS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 315M vs GeForce 9300M GS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 315M

2015

Why buy it

  • 0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

GeForce 9300M GS

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 315M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 315M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9300M GS instead at 118 vs 115, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 315M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9300M GS makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 9300M GS is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 315M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 315M vs GeForce 9300M GS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

The GeForce 315M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300M GS

The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 315M scores 115 and the GeForce 9300M GS reaches 118 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 315M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9300M GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 315M) vs 384 (GeForce 9300M GS). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 315M) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 549 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
G3D Mark Score
115
118+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+210%
0.4216 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1020 MHz+86%
549 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+67%
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 315M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9300M GS carries 256 MB. GeForce 315M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 315M and 128-bit on the GeForce 9300M GS. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 315M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) — the GeForce 315M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 315M) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300M GS). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
DirectX
10.1
10.0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 315M) vs No (GeForce 9300M GS). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 315M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M GS).

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 315M draws 75W versus the GeForce 9300M GS's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 315M) vs 350W (GeForce 9300M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce 9300M GS
TDP
75W
33W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
1.5
3.6+140%