GeForce 315M
VS
Radeon HD 3470

GeForce 315M vs Radeon HD 3470

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3470

2008Core: 750 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 315M is positioned at rank 535 and the Radeon HD 3470 is on rank 315, so the Radeon HD 3470 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 315M

#525
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2835%
#527
2570%
#528
2563%
#532
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2331%
#533
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2315%
#535
GeForce 315M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#536
100%
#538
99%
#539
Radeon R7 M445
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#540
Mobility Radeon HD 540v
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#541
98%
#542
97%
#543
Radeon HD 7640G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#544
Radeon R9 M275
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#545
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#546
96%
#547
96%
#548
Radeon R5 M335
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#549
95%
#550
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3470

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
3720%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3574%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
3532%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3526%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3519%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
3499%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
3455%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3442%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3410%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
3401%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
3360%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3353%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
3292%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3290%
#300
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
4103%
#315
Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#316
Radeon HD 3000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#317
GeForce GT 120
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
96%
#318
Radeon HD 6250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#319
GeForce 6600 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
87%
#320
Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
87%
#321
Radeon HD 3200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
84%
#322
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
79%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
78%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
77%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
71%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
67%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
59%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
57%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 315M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 315M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 3470 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 3470 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 315M.

InsightGeForce 315MRadeon HD 3470
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 3470 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 315M and Radeon HD 3470

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

The GeForce 315M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3470

The Radeon HD 3470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 117 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 315M scores 115 and the Radeon HD 3470 reaches 117 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 315M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3470 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 315M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 3470). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 315M) vs 1.2 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3470).

FeatureGeForce 315MRadeon HD 3470
G3D Mark Score
115
117+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
640
800+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+9%
1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
320 KB+100%
160 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 315MRadeon HD 3470
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 315M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 3470) — the GeForce 315M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 315MRadeon HD 3470
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 315M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3470). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 315MRadeon HD 3470
DirectX
10.1
10.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 315M) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3470). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD.

FeatureGeForce 315MRadeon HD 3470
Encoder
None
UVD
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 315M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 3470's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce 315M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 315M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3470). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 315MRadeon HD 3470
TDP
75W-50%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
1.5+87%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 315M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 315MRadeon HD 3470
MSRP
$60
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Codename
GM107
RV770
Release
October 27 2015
June 25 2008
Ranking
#671
#784