GeForce 315M
VS
Quadro FX 380M

GeForce 315M vs Quadro FX 380M

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 315M is positioned at rank 535 and the Quadro FX 380M is on rank 161, so the Quadro FX 380M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 315M

#525
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2835%
#527
2570%
#528
2563%
#532
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2331%
#533
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2315%
#535
GeForce 315M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#536
100%
#538
99%
#539
Radeon R7 M445
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#540
Mobility Radeon HD 540v
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#541
98%
#542
97%
#543
Radeon HD 7640G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#544
Radeon R9 M275
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#545
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#546
96%
#547
96%
#548
Radeon R5 M335
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#549
95%
#550
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380M

#74
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095
94%
#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
88%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
87%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
86%
#146
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1831%
#161
Quadro FX 380M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#166
FirePro W5100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
93%
#167
Radeon Pro WX 4170
MSRP: $400|Avg: $120
89%
#168
FirePro W4300
MSRP: $379|Avg: $50
89%
#169
Quadro K2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
89%
#173
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $86
87%
#175
Radeon Pro 560
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
86%
#176
Radeon Pro 460
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 315M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 315M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 380M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 380M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 315M.

InsightGeForce 315MQuadro FX 380M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%)
Leading raw performance (+5.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 380M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 315M and Quadro FX 380M

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

The GeForce 315M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380M

The Quadro FX 380M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 315M scores 115 versus the Quadro FX 380M's 121 — the Quadro FX 380M leads by 5.2%. The GeForce 315M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 380M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 315M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380M). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 315M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380M).

FeatureGeForce 315MQuadro FX 380M
G3D Mark Score
115
121+5%
Architecture
Maxwell
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
640+167%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+110%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 315MQuadro FX 380M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 315M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 380M) — the GeForce 315M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 315MQuadro FX 380M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 315M) vs 11.1 (FL10_1) (Quadro FX 380M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 315MQuadro FX 380M
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (FL10_1)+10%
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 315M) vs VP4 (Quadro FX 380M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 315M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro FX 380M).

FeatureGeForce 315MQuadro FX 380M
Encoder
None
VP4
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 315M draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 380M's 189W — a 86.4% difference. The GeForce 315M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 315M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 315MQuadro FX 380M
TDP
75W-60%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
1.5+150%
0.6