FirePro 2260 vs GeForce 315M

FirePro 2260

2012Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 2260 vs GeForce 315M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2260 vs GeForce 315M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2260

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce 315M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 315M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (115 vs 113), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 2260 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2260 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce 315M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 2260 vs GeForce 315M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2260

The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

The GeForce 315M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 2260 scores 113 and the GeForce 315M reaches 115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 315M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2260) vs 640 (GeForce 315M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 315M).

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce 315M
G3D Mark Score
113
115+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+70%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB
320 KB+150%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 315M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 2260 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce 315M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2260 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 315M carries 512 MB. FirePro 2260 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2260 and 128-bit on the GeForce 315M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2260) vs 2 MB (GeForce 315M) — the GeForce 315M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce 315M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2260) vs 10.1 (GeForce 315M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce 315M
DirectX
10.1
10.1
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 1.0 (FirePro 2260) vs None (GeForce 315M). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (FirePro 2260) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 315M).

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce 315M
Encoder
UVD 1.0
None
Decoder
UVD 1.0
PureVideo VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2260 draws 75W versus the GeForce 315M's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 315M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2260) vs 350W (GeForce 315M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce 315M
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
65°C-24%
85°C
Perf/Watt
1.5
1.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 315M (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce 315M
MSRP
$129
Codename
Cape Verde
GM107
Release
June 13 2012
October 27 2015
Ranking
#732
#671

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.