
FirePro 2260

GeForce Go 7800
FirePro 2260 vs GeForce Go 7800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2260 vs GeForce Go 7800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2260 vs GeForce Go 7800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2260
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce Go 7800
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2260 vs GeForce Go 7800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2260
The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce Go 7800
The GeForce Go 7800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2260 scores 113 and the GeForce Go 7800 reaches 115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce Go 7800 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2260) vs 2,304 (GeForce Go 7800). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260) vs 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 113 | 115+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2304+350% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 4.156 TFLOPS+441% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 192+500% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.5 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 7800 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 2260 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2260 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7800 carries 256 MB. FirePro 2260 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2260 and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7800. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2260) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800) — the GeForce Go 7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+1500% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.5 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2260) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 1.0 (FirePro 2260) vs None (GeForce Go 7800). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (FirePro 2260) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce Go 7800).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 1.0 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2260 draws 75W versus the GeForce Go 7800's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The FirePro 2260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2260) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5+200% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce Go 7800 (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | — |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GK110 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | May 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #732 | #320 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














