Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 2260 vs GeForce GT 320M

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 2260

2012Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 2260 vs GeForce GT 320M Performance Spectrum

FirePro 2260
4 GB 75
113
0.0%
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 3410
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi
brand logoRadeon HD 3200
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 4250
brand logoRadeon 860M
brand logoRadeon RX 6500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce GT 320M
1 GB 30
114
+0.9%
brand logoGeForce G 103M
brand logoGeForce 7350 LE
brand logoGeForce 6600
brand logoGeForce 9400M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1630
brand logoGeForce GTX 970
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2260 vs GeForce GT 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2260

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

GeForce GT 320M

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 320M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (114 vs 113), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 2260 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2260 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GT 320M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 2260 vs GeForce GT 320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2260

The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 2260 scores 113 and the GeForce GT 320M reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 320M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2260) vs 384 (GeForce GT 320M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M).

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce GT 320M
G3D Mark Score
113
114
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
1.127 TFLOPS+47%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB
144 KB+13%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 2260 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce GT 320M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2260 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 320M carries 1 GB. FirePro 2260 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2260 and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 2260) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 320M) — the GeForce GT 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce GT 320M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+300%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2260) vs 11.1 (FL10_1) (GeForce GT 320M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce GT 320M
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (FL10_1)+10%
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 1.0 (FirePro 2260) vs VP4 (GeForce GT 320M). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (FirePro 2260) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 320M).

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce GT 320M
Encoder
UVD 1.0
VP4
Decoder
UVD 1.0
VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2260 draws 75W versus the GeForce GT 320M's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2260) vs 350W (GeForce GT 320M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce GT 320M
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-19%
80°C
Perf/Watt
1.5
3.8+153%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 320M (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro 2260GeForce GT 320M
MSRP
$129
—
Codename
Cape Verde
GP108
Release
June 13 2012
May 17 2017
Ranking
#732
#641
Search FirePro 2260 on AmazonSearch GeForce GT 320M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.