FirePro 2260 vs GeForce GT 320M
FirePro 2260
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 320M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 2260 is positioned at rank 360 and the GeForce GT 320M is on rank 163, so the GeForce GT 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 2260
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 320M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 320M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 2260 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 2260 | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 320M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 2260 and GeForce GT 320M
FirePro 2260
The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce GT 320M
The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2260 scores 113 and the GeForce GT 320M reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 320M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2260) vs 384 (GeForce GT 320M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 113 | 114 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 144 KB+13% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2260 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 320M has 1 GB. The FirePro 2260 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 2260) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 320M) — the GeForce GT 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2260) vs 11.1 (FL10_1) (GeForce GT 320M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.1 (FL10_1)+10% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 1.0 (FirePro 2260) vs VP4 (GeForce GT 320M). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (FirePro 2260) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 320M).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 1.0 | VP4 |
| Decoder | UVD 1.0 | VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2260 draws 75W versus the GeForce GT 320M's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2260) vs 350W (GeForce GT 320M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 3.8+153% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 320M is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GP108 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #732 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 2260 and GeForce GT 320M
