FirePro 2260 vs Radeon HD 7290

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2260 vs Radeon HD 7290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 2260 vs Radeon HD 7290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2260

2012

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 375W, a 300W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
545% HIGHER MSRP
$129 MSRPvs$20 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $20 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7290

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($20 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Delivers 539.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($20 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌400% higher power demand at 375W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro 2260 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (113 vs 112), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 2260 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7290 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $109 cheaper on MSRP at $20 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 539.3% (5.6 vs 0.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7290 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 2260 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 2260 vs Radeon HD 7290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2260

The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 7290

The Radeon HD 7290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 112 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 2260 scores 113 and the Radeon HD 7290 reaches 112 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7290 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2260) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7290). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7290).

Feature	FirePro 2260	Radeon HD 7290
G3D Mark Score	113	112
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	2048 ×2+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS ×2+433%
ROPs	16	32 ×2+100%
TMUs	32	128 ×2+300%
L1 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 2260	Radeon HD 7290
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2260 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7290 carries 512 MB. FirePro 2260 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2260 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7290. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 2260) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7290) — the Radeon HD 7290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro 2260	Radeon HD 7290
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2260 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7290's 375W — a 133.3% difference. The FirePro 2260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2260) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro 2260	Radeon HD 7290
TDP	75W-80%	375W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.5+400%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2260 came in at $129, while the Radeon HD 7290 launched at $20. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7290 was 84.5% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2260) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 7290) — the Radeon HD 7290 offers 522.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7290 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro 2260	Radeon HD 7290
MSRP	$129	$20-84%
Performance per Dollar	0.9	5.6+522%
Codename	Cape Verde	Malta
Release	June 13 2012	April 24 2013
Ranking	#732	#412

Search FirePro 2260 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7290 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.