FirePro 2260 vs GeForce 405
FirePro 2260
Popular choices:
GeForce 405
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 2260 is positioned at rank 360 and the GeForce 405 is on rank 589, so the FirePro 2260 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 2260
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 405
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 405 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 2260 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 405 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 405 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 405 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $15), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 213.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 405 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+213.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 2260 and GeForce 405
FirePro 2260
The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce 405
The GeForce 405 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2260 scores 113 and the GeForce 405 reaches 118 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 405 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2260) vs 640 (GeForce 405). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 405).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 405 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 113 | 118+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1.306 TFLOPS+70% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 320 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 405 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2260 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 405 has 512 MB. The FirePro 2260 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2260) vs 2 MB (GeForce 405) — the GeForce 405 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 405 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2260) vs 10.1 (GeForce 405). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 405 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 1.0 (FirePro 2260) vs None (GeForce 405). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (FirePro 2260) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 405).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 405 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 1.0 | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2260 draws 75W versus the GeForce 405's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 405 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2260) vs 350W (GeForce 405). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 405 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | 64mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 1.6+7% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 2260 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 405 launched at $40 and now averages $5. The GeForce 405 costs 66.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.5 (FirePro 2260) vs 23.6 (GeForce 405) — the GeForce 405 offers 214.7% better value. The GeForce 405 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 405 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $40-69% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $5-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.5 | 23.6+215% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GM107 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | October 27 2015 |
| Ranking | #732 | #671 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 2260 and GeForce 405
