FirePro 2260
GeForce 9300M GS
FirePro 2260 vs GeForce 9300M GS Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2260 vs GeForce 9300M GS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro 2260 vs GeForce 9300M GS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2260
2012Why buy it
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌29% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.
GeForce 9300M GS
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2260 vs GeForce 9300M GS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro 2260
The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce 9300M GS
The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2260 scores 113 and the GeForce 9300M GS reaches 118 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 9300M GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2260) vs 384 (GeForce 9300M GS). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 113 | 118+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+82% | 0.4216 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9300M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 2260 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2260 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9300M GS carries 256 MB. FirePro 2260 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2260 and 128-bit on the GeForce 9300M GS. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2260) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) — the GeForce 9300M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+1500% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2260) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300M GS). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 1.0 (FirePro 2260) vs No (GeForce 9300M GS). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (FirePro 2260) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M GS).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 1.0 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 1.0 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2260 draws 75W versus the GeForce 9300M GS's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2260) vs 350W (GeForce 9300M GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 33W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 3.6+140% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2260 came in at $129, while the GeForce 9300M GS launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 9300M GS was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2260) vs 1.2 (GeForce 9300M GS) — the GeForce 9300M GS offers 33.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9300M GS (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $100-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 1.2+33% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GM108 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #732 | #880 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 2260 and GeForce 9300M GS
