FirePro 2260 vs Quadro FX 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2260 vs Quadro FX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 2260 vs Quadro FX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2260

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 129.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
131.8% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 560 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (114 vs 113), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 2260 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro 2260 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 129.7% (0.9 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 560 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 2260 vs Quadro FX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2260

The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 2260 scores 113 and the Quadro FX 560 reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2260) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).

Feature	FirePro 2260	Quadro FX 560
G3D Mark Score	113	114
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	512+113%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS+23%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 2260	Quadro FX 560
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2260 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 560 carries 128 MB. FirePro 2260 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2260 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560.

Feature	FirePro 2260	Quadro FX 560
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+3100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2260) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	FirePro 2260	Quadro FX 560
DirectX	10.1+12%	9_0c
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2260 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W — a 86.4% difference. The FirePro 2260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2260) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	FirePro 2260	Quadro FX 560
TDP	75W-60%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	1mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.5+150%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2260 came in at $129, while the Quadro FX 560 launched at $299. On MSRP, FirePro 2260 was 56.9% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2260) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) — the FirePro 2260 offers 125% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2260 (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	FirePro 2260	Quadro FX 560
MSRP	$129-57%	$299
Performance per Dollar	0.9+125%	0.4
Codename	Cape Verde	GT200B
Release	June 13 2012	November 11 2008
Ranking	#732	#815

Search FirePro 2260 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.