GeForce 315M
VS
GeForce GT 320M

GeForce 315M vs GeForce GT 320M

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 315M is positioned at rank 535 and the GeForce GT 320M is on rank 163, so the GeForce GT 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 315M

#525
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2835%
#527
2570%
#528
2563%
#532
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2331%
#533
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2315%
#535
GeForce 315M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#536
100%
#538
99%
#539
Radeon R7 M445
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#540
Mobility Radeon HD 540v
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#541
98%
#542
97%
#543
Radeon HD 7640G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#544
Radeon R9 M275
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#545
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#546
96%
#547
96%
#548
Radeon R5 M335
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#549
95%
#550
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 320M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
954%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
917%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
906%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
905%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
903%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
898%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
886%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
883%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
875%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
873%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
862%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
860%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
845%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
844%
#90
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $4086.44
98%
#91
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
#92
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
95%
#148
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1053%
#163
GeForce GT 320M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#164
99%
#165
Radeon HD 6520G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
99%
#166
GeForce GT 545
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
98%
#167
Radeon HD 8470D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#170
GeForce GT 340
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#171
GeForce GT 230
MSRP: $44|Avg: $44
97%
#172
Radeon HD 6670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
96%
#175
Radeon R5 420
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
95%
#176
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $50
94%
#177
Radeon HD 6570
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
93%
#178
Radeon HD 8370D
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 315M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 320M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce 315MGeForce GT 320M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 315M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 315M and GeForce GT 320M

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

The GeForce 315M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 315M scores 115 and the GeForce GT 320M reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 315M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 320M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 315M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 320M). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 315M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce GT 320M
G3D Mark Score
115
114
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+16%
1.127 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1020 MHz
1468 MHz+44%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+122%
144 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce GT 320M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 315M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 320M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 320M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 315M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 320M) — the GeForce 315M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce GT 320M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 315M) vs 11.1 (FL10_1) (GeForce GT 320M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce GT 320M
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (FL10_1)+10%
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 315M) vs VP4 (GeForce GT 320M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 315M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 320M).

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce GT 320M
Encoder
None
VP4
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 315M draws 75W versus the GeForce GT 320M's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 315M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 315MGeForce GT 320M
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
1.5
3.8+153%