GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon HD 6310

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300M GS

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6310

2011Core: 750 MHz

GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon HD 6310 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon HD 6310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon HD 6310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300M GS

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 33W instead of 186W, a 153W reduction.
  • βœ…More future proof: Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    100% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 106.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌463.6% higher power demand at 186W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.4% in PassMark G3D (122 vs 118), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9300M GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 106.8% (2.4 vs 1.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9300M GS has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon HD 6310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300M GS

The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300M GS scores 118 and the Radeon HD 6310 reaches 122 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300M GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).

FeatureGeForce 9300M GSRadeon HD 6310
G3D Mark Score
118
122+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+355%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L1 Cache
192 KB
320 KB+67%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9300M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9300M GSRadeon HD 6310
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9300M GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6310 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6310 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300M GS and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6310) β€” the GeForce 9300M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9300M GSRadeon HD 6310
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300M GS draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W β€” a 139.7% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 9300M GSRadeon HD 6310
TDP
33W-82%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
β€”
Height
0mm
β€”
Slots
0
β€”
Temp (Load)
80Β°C
β€”
Perf/Watt
3.6+414%
0.7
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9300M GS came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6310 was 50% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) β€” the Radeon HD 6310 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9300M GS (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 9300M GSRadeon HD 6310
MSRP
$100
$50-50%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
2.4+100%
Codename
GM108
Cayman
Release
March 13 2015
December 1 2011
Ranking
#880
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.