
GeForce 9300M GS

Radeon HD 2400 XT
GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon HD 2400 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon HD 2400 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon HD 2400 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9300M GS
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 185W, a 152W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 2400 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌26.6% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Radeon HD 2400 XT
2012Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌460.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon HD 2400 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9300M GS
The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

Radeon HD 2400 XT
The Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 119 points. Launch price was $270.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300M GS scores 118 and the Radeon HD 2400 XT reaches 119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300M GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 2400 XT uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 2.995 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 118 | 119 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 2.995 TFLOPS+610% |
| Boost Clock | 549 MHz | 975 MHz+78% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 96+300% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9300M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2400 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300M GS and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2400 XT. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the GeForce 9300M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300M GS draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 2400 XT's 185W — a 139.4% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-82% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6+500% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9300M GS came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 2400 XT launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon HD 2400 XT was 21% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the Radeon HD 2400 XT offers 25% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9300M GS (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $79-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 1.5+25% |
| Codename | GM108 | Tahiti |
| Release | March 13 2015 | November 19 2012 |
| Ranking | #880 | #469 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














