CPU
GPU
GeForce 9300M GS
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9300M GS is positioned at rank 686 and the Radeon HD 4250 is on rank 299, so the Radeon HD 4250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300M GS
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9300M GS is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 9300M GS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9300M GS.
| Insight | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4250 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $10), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 4.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9300M GS and Radeon HD 4250
GeForce 9300M GS
The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.
Radeon HD 4250
The Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300M GS scores 118 and the Radeon HD 4250 reaches 123 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300M GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4250 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4250). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4250).
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 118 | 123+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS+137% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9300M GS comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4250 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4250 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4250) — the GeForce 9300M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9300M GS) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4250). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300M GS draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 4250's 110W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4250). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-70% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6+227% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9300M GS launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon HD 4250 launched at $50 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.8 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 12.3 (Radeon HD 4250) — the Radeon HD 4250 offers 4.2% better value. The GeForce 9300M GS is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | Radeon HD 4250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $50-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8 | 12.3+4% |
| Codename | GM108 | RV770 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #880 | #876 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9300M GS and Radeon HD 4250
