GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon X1600 XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon X1600 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon X1600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300M GS

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 102.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 300W, a 267W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon X1600 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1600 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅GeForce 9300M GS is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 XT is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
99% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌809.1% higher power demand at 300W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1600 XT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9300M GS instead at 118 vs 116, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1600 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9300M GS makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 102.4% (1.2 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 9300M GS is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1600 XT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon X1600 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9300M GS

The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

Radeon X1600 XT

The Radeon X1600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 116 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300M GS scores 118 and the Radeon X1600 XT reaches 116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300M GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon X1600 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1600 XT). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 XT). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 2250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Radeon X1600 XT
G3D Mark Score	118+2%	116
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	5120+1233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	23.04 TFLOPS+5365%
Boost Clock	549 MHz	2250 MHz+310%
ROPs	8	128+1500%
TMUs	24	320+1233%
L1 Cache	0.19 MB	1 MB+426%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9300M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1600 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Radeon X1600 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9300M GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 XT carries 512 MB. Radeon X1600 XT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300M GS and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 XT. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1600 XT) — the Radeon X1600 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Radeon X1600 XT
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300M GS draws 33W versus the Radeon X1600 XT's 300W — a 160.4% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Radeon X1600 XT
TDP	33W-89%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.6+800%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9300M GS came in at $100, while the Radeon X1600 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce 9300M GS was 49.7% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1600 XT) — the GeForce 9300M GS offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 XT (2020 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP	$100-50%	$199
Performance per Dollar	1.2+100%	0.6
Codename	GM108	Navi 21
Release	March 13 2015	October 28 2020
Ranking	#880	#35

Search GeForce 9300M GS on Amazon

Search Radeon X1600 XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.