GeForce 9300M GS
VS
Quadro FX 1400

GeForce 9300M GS vs Quadro FX 1400

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300M GS

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

2008Core: 602 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9300M GS is positioned at rank 686 and the Quadro FX 1400 is on rank 410, so the Quadro FX 1400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300M GS

#676
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
9201%
#678
8341%
#679
8319%
#683
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
7564%
#684
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
7513%
#686
GeForce 9300M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#687
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $1
97%
#688
GeForce 6150 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
93%
#689
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
90%
#690
GeForce 9450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
89%
#691
GeForce 9800 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $75
86%
#692
GeForce 7900 GS
MSRP: $259|Avg: $50
86%
#693
MOBILITY RADEON X600
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
85%
#694
Mobility Radeon X2300
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
83%
#695
Mobility Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
83%
#696
Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
83%
#697
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $12
81%
#698
GeForce 8600 GTS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $35
79%
#699
GeForce 8800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $50
79%
#700
Mobility Radeon HD 3450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
77%
#701
GeForce 8800 GTS
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400

#395
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
92331%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
100%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
100%
#413
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
75%
#414
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
63%
#417
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
56%
#418
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
50%
#419
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
50%
#420
Quadro FX 1000
MSRP: $500|Avg: $30
44%
#421
Quadro FX 1300
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
38%
#422
Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50
38%
#423
Quadro FX 4000
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50
31%
#424
RADEON IGP 320
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
25%
#425
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
13%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 9300M GS is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 9300M GS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9300M GS offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce 9300M GSQuadro FX 1400
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.1%)
Leading raw performance (+5.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9300M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9300M GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 185.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 9300M GSQuadro FX 1400
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+185.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9300M GS and Quadro FX 1400

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300M GS

The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9300M GS scores 118 versus the Quadro FX 1400's 124 — the Quadro FX 1400 leads by 5.1%. The GeForce 9300M GS is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 192 (Quadro FX 1400). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400).

FeatureGeForce 9300M GSQuadro FX 1400
G3D Mark Score
118
124+5%
Architecture
Maxwell
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
0.4623 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs
8
24+200%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L2 Cache
1 MB+426%
0.19 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9300M GSQuadro FX 1400
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9300M GS comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1400 has 128 MB. The GeForce 9300M GS offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce 9300M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9300M GSQuadro FX 1400
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB+100%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+426%
0.19 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300M GS draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 1400's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 9300M GSQuadro FX 1400
TDP
33W-78%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
3.6+350%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9300M GS launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 1400 launched at $799 and now averages $30. The GeForce 9300M GS costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.8 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 4.1 (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce 9300M GS offers 187.8% better value. The GeForce 9300M GS is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9300M GSQuadro FX 1400
MSRP
$100-87%
$799
Avg Price (30d)
$10-67%
$30
Performance per Dollar
11.8+188%
4.1
Codename
GM108
GT200B
Release
March 13 2015
November 11 2008
Ranking
#880
#884