GeForce GT 320M vs RADEON X800 GTO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 320M vs RADEON X800 GTO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 320M vs RADEON X800 GTO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 320M

2017

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 300W, a 270W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X800 GTO across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

RADEON X800 GTO

2020

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce GT 320M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X800 GTO is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌900% higher power demand at 300W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X800 GTO is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (115 vs 114), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X800 GTO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X800 GTO makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 320M vs RADEON X800 GTO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 320M

The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.

RADEON X800 GTO

The RADEON X800 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 320M scores 114 and the RADEON X800 GTO reaches 115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 320M is built on Pascal while the RADEON X800 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320M) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 GTO). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 GTO). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 2250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 320M	RADEON X800 GTO
G3D Mark Score	114	115
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	4608+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	20.74 TFLOPS+1740%
Boost Clock	1468 MHz	2250 MHz+53%
ROPs	16	128+700%
TMUs	24	288+1100%
L1 Cache	0.14 MB	1 MB+614%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X800 GTO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 320M	RADEON X800 GTO
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 320M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 GTO carries 256 MB. GeForce GT 320M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320M and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 GTO. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 320M) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 GTO) — the RADEON X800 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 320M	RADEON X800 GTO
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+300%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 320M draws 30W versus the RADEON X800 GTO's 300W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 320M) vs 350W (RADEON X800 GTO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce GT 320M	RADEON X800 GTO
TDP	30W-90%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.8+850%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON X800 GTO (2020 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce GT 320M	RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	GP108	Navi 21
Release	May 17 2017	October 28 2020
Ranking	#641	#42

Search GeForce GT 320M on Amazon

Search RADEON X800 GTO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.