GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 2400 XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 2400 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 2400 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 320M

2017

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 185W, a 155W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 2400 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon HD 2400 XT

2012

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌516.7% higher power demand at 185W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 2400 XT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.4% in PassMark G3D (119 vs 114), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 2400 XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 2400 XT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 320M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 2400 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 320M

The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 119 points. Launch price was $270.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 320M scores 114 and the Radeon HD 2400 XT reaches 119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 320M is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 2400 XT uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M) vs 2.995 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 320M	Radeon HD 2400 XT
G3D Mark Score	114	119+4%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	2.995 TFLOPS+166%
Boost Clock	1468 MHz+51%	975 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	96+300%
L1 Cache	144 KB	384 KB+167%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2400 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 320M	Radeon HD 2400 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 320M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2400 XT carries 256 MB. GeForce GT 320M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2400 XT.

Feature	GeForce GT 320M	Radeon HD 2400 XT
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+300%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 320M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 2400 XT's 185W — a 144.2% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 320M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 320M	Radeon HD 2400 XT
TDP	30W-84%	185W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.8+533%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 320M (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT 320M	Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP	—	$79
Codename	GP108	Tahiti
Release	May 17 2017	November 19 2012
Ranking	#641	#469

Search GeForce GT 320M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 2400 XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.