GeForce GT 320M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
GeForce GT 320M
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 320M is positioned at rank 163 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is on rank 626, so the GeForce GT 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 320M
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 320M is significantly newer (2017 vs 2009). The GeForce GT 320M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 320M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi.
| Insight | GeForce GT 320M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 320M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 320M and Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
GeForce GT 320M
The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 111 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 320M scores 114 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi reaches 111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 320M is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi).
| Feature | GeForce GT 320M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 114+3% | 111 |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS+28% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 160 KB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 320M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 320M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 320M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 320M) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) — the GeForce GT 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_1) (GeForce GT 320M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (FL10_1)+10% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VP4 (GeForce GT 320M) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VP4 | UVD |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 320M draws 30W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi's 30W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 320M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 320M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.8+3% | 3.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 320M is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GT 320M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GP108 | M98 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #641 | #927 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 320M and Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
