GeForce GT 320M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

2009Core: 550 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 320M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 320M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 320M

2017

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

2009

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 320M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (114 vs 111), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 320M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 320M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 111 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 320M scores 114 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi reaches 111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 320M is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
G3D Mark Score
114+3%
111
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale
Process Node
14 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+28%
0.88 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
144 KB
160 KB+11%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 320M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 320M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320M and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 320M) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) — the GeForce GT 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_1) (GeForce GT 320M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
DirectX
11.1 (FL10_1)+10%
10.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VP4 (GeForce GT 320M) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Encoder
VP4
UVD
Decoder
VP4
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 320M draws 30W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi's 30W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 320M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
TDP
30W
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
3.8+3%
3.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 320M (2017 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
MSRP
$49
Codename
GP108
M98
Release
May 17 2017
January 9 2009
Ranking
#641
#927

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.