FirePro 2260 vs Mobility Radeon X1700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2260 vs Mobility Radeon X1700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2260 vs Mobility Radeon X1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2260
2012Why buy it
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌163.3% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Mobility Radeon X1700
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 144.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2260 vs Mobility Radeon X1700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2260
The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.

Mobility Radeon X1700
The Mobility Radeon X1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2260 scores 113 versus the Mobility Radeon X1700's 105 — the FirePro 2260 leads by 7.6%. The FirePro 2260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Mobility Radeon X1700 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2260) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1700). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1700).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 113+8% | 105 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 800+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+46% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2260 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1700 carries 256 MB. FirePro 2260 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2260 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1700.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+1500% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2260) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1700). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+65% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 1.0 (FirePro 2260) vs Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1700). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (FirePro 2260) vs MPEG-2,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1700).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 1.0 | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD 1.0 | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2260 draws 75W versus the Mobility Radeon X1700's 50W — a 40% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2260) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 2.1+40% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2260 came in at $129, while the Mobility Radeon X1700 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1700 was 62% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FirePro 2260) vs 2.1 (Mobility Radeon X1700) — the Mobility Radeon X1700 offers 133.3% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2260 (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $49-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 2.1+133% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Broadway |
| Release | June 13 2012 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #732 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















