Mobility Radeon X1700 vs Quadro FX 3400/4400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon X1700 vs Quadro FX 3400/4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon X1700 vs Quadro FX 3400/4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon X1700

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3606.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3400/4400

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
3571.4% HIGHER MSRP
$1,799 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Mobility Radeon X1700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (105 vs 104), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon X1700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon X1700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,750 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $1,799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3606.7% (2.1 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Mobility Radeon X1700 vs Quadro FX 3400/4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon X1700

The Mobility Radeon X1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

Quadro FX 3400/4400

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon X1700 scores 105 and the Quadro FX 3400/4400 reaches 104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon X1700 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 3400/4400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 192 (Quadro FX 3400/4400). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3400/4400).

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1700	Quadro FX 3400/4400
G3D Mark Score	105	104
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800+317%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+142%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	40	64+60%
L2 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1700	Quadro FX 3400/4400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1700 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3400/4400. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 3400/4400) — the Mobility Radeon X1700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1700	Quadro FX 3400/4400
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon X1700 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 3400/4400's 150W — a 100% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3400/4400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1700	Quadro FX 3400/4400
TDP	50W-67%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.1+200%	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon X1700 came in at $49, while the Quadro FX 3400/4400 launched at $1799. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1700 was 97.3% cheaper ($1750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Mobility Radeon X1700) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 3400/4400) — the Mobility Radeon X1700 offers 2000% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon X1700 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1700	Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP	$49-97%	$1799
Performance per Dollar	2.1+2000%	0.1
Codename	Broadway	GT200B
Release	January 7 2010	November 11 2008
Ranking	#846	#884

Search Mobility Radeon X1700 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 3400/4400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.