
Quadro FX Go1400

Radeon X1950 GT
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1950 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1950 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1950 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX Go1400
2008Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 335W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon X1950 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
Radeon X1950 GT
2022Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Quadro FX Go1400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1950 GT is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌123.3% higher power demand at 335W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1950 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX Go1400
The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon X1950 GT
The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX Go1400 scores 102 and the Radeon X1950 GT reaches 106 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1950 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT).
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 102 | 106+4% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 5120+2567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 23.8 TFLOPS+5048% |
| ROPs | 24 | 128+433% |
| TMUs | 64 | 320+400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 4 MB+2005% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1950 GT carries 512 MB. Quadro FX Go1400 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX Go1400 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1950 GT. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Radeon X1950 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 4 MB+2005% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX Go1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 335W — a 76.3% difference. The Quadro FX Go1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 350W (Radeon X1950 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-55% | 335W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 230mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7+133% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon X1950 GT (2022 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $140 |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 21 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #884 | #25 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














