GeForce 9500M vs Radeon 3000

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 3000

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9500M vs Radeon 3000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9500M vs Radeon 3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9500M vs Radeon 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9500M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Radeon 3000

2019

Why buy it

  • GeForce 9500M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9500M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6.1% in PassMark G3D (104 vs 98), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 3000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9500M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 9500M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 3000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9500M vs Radeon 3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M

The GeForce 9500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.

AMD

Radeon 3000

The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9500M scores 104 versus the Radeon 3000's 98 — the GeForce 9500M leads by 6.1%. The GeForce 9500M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9500M) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9500M) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon 3000
G3D Mark Score
104+6%
98
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640+25%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+5%
1.247 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1020 MHz
1218 MHz+19%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
320 KB+150%
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9500M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 3000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon 3000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9500M and 64-bit on the Radeon 3000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9500M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3000) — the GeForce 9500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon 3000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9500M) vs 10_0 (Radeon 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon 3000
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+11%
10_0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G84) (GeForce 9500M) vs Avivo HD (Radeon 3000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs Avivo HD.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon 3000
Encoder
No NVENC (G84)
Avivo HD
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
Avivo HD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9500M draws 75W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500M) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon 3000
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
1.4
2.0+43%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 3000 (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 9500MRadeon 3000
MSRP
$0
Codename
GM107
Polaris 23
Release
October 27 2015
May 13 2019
Ranking
#671
#757

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.