GeForce 9500M
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

GeForce 9500M vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

2009Core: 550 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9500M is positioned at rank 557 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is on rank 637, so the GeForce 9500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9500M

#547
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3129%
#549
2836%
#550
2829%
#554
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2572%
#555
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2555%
#557
GeForce 9500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#558
100%
#559
Radeon HD 8690A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#560
98%
#561
97%
#562
97%
#563
GeForce 9200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#564
Radeon R7 M265DX
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
97%
#565
Radeon R9 M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#567
95%
#568
95%
#569
95%
#570
95%
#571
Radeon R5 M315
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#572
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
MSRP: $599|Avg: $300
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

#626
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
5220%
#628
4732%
#629
4719%
#633
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4291%
#634
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4262%
#636
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#637
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#638
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
99%
#639
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#640
GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
98%
#641
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#642
95%
#643
GeForce 9500 GS
MSRP: $110|Avg: $10
94%
#644
GeForce 9300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
94%
#645
92%
#646
GeForce 9500 GT
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
91%
#647
Mobility Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
#648
GeForce 8500 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
91%
#649
Mobility Radeon X1600
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
#650
Radeon HD 3650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
90%
#651
GeForce 9400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 9500M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The GeForce 9500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT.

InsightGeForce 9500MMobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 9500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9500M and Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M

The GeForce 9500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9500M scores 104 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9500M is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9500M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9500M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT).

FeatureGeForce 9500MMobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
G3D Mark Score
104+2%
102
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
640
800 ×2+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+48%
0.88 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
16
16 ×2
TMUs
40
40 ×2
L1 Cache
320 KB+100%
160 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9500MMobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9500M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT has 256 MB. The GeForce 9500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9500M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the GeForce 9500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9500MMobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9500M) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9500MMobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+11%
10.0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G84) (GeForce 9500M) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9500M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT).

FeatureGeForce 9500MMobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Encoder
No NVENC (G84)
Avivo HD
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
UVD 1.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9500M draws 75W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce 9500MMobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
85
Perf/Watt
1.4
3.4+143%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9500M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce 9500MMobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP
$49
Avg Price (30d)
$49
Codename
GM107
M98
Release
October 27 2015
January 9 2009
Ranking
#671
#818