GeForce 9500M
VS
GeForce Go 6800

GeForce 9500M vs GeForce Go 6800

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6800

2012Core: 1006 MHzBoost: 1058 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9500M is positioned at rank 557 and the GeForce Go 6800 is on rank 277, so the GeForce Go 6800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9500M

#547
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3129%
#549
2836%
#550
2829%
#554
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2572%
#555
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2555%
#557
GeForce 9500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#558
100%
#559
Radeon HD 8690A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#560
98%
#561
97%
#562
97%
#563
GeForce 9200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#564
Radeon R7 M265DX
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
97%
#565
Radeon R9 M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#567
95%
#568
95%
#569
95%
#570
95%
#571
Radeon R5 M315
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#572
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
MSRP: $599|Avg: $300
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6800

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2055%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1974%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1951%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1948%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1944%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1933%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1908%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1901%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1884%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1879%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1856%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1852%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1819%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1818%
#262
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2266%
#277
GeForce Go 6800
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#278
Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
99%
#279
Radeon R4
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#281
Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
97%
#282
Radeon HD 6410D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
96%
#283
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
MSRP: $130|Avg: $130
94%
#285
Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
92%
#286
Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $83|Avg: $83
92%
#287
GeForce GT 220
MSRP: $69|Avg: $49
91%
#288
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
88%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
84%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
80%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 6800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9500M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce 9500MGeForce Go 6800
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9500M and GeForce Go 6800

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M

The GeForce 9500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6800

The GeForce Go 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9500M scores 104 and the GeForce Go 6800 reaches 106 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9500M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 6800 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9500M) vs 1,536 (GeForce Go 6800). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9500M) vs 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6800). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 1058 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9500MGeForce Go 6800
G3D Mark Score
104
106+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
1536+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS
3.25 TFLOPS+149%
Boost Clock
1020 MHz
1058 MHz+4%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
128+220%
L1 Cache
320 KB+150%
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9500MGeForce Go 6800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9500M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6800 has 128 MB. The GeForce 9500M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9500M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce Go 6800) — the GeForce 9500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9500MGeForce Go 6800
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9500M) vs 10.0 (GeForce Go 6800). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 9500MGeForce Go 6800
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+11%
10.0
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G84) (GeForce 9500M) vs No (GeForce Go 6800). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9500M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6800).

FeatureGeForce 9500MGeForce Go 6800
Encoder
No NVENC (G84)
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9500M draws 75W versus the GeForce Go 6800's 195W — a 88.9% difference. The GeForce 9500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500M) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6800). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 9500MGeForce Go 6800
TDP
75W-62%
195W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
1.4+180%
0.5