
GeForce 9500M
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9500M is positioned at rank 557 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is on rank 626, so the GeForce 9500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9500M
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9500M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The GeForce 9500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9500M.
| Insight | GeForce 9500M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9500M and Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

GeForce 9500M
The GeForce 9500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 111 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9500M scores 104 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi's 111 — the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi leads by 6.7%. The GeForce 9500M is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9500M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9500M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi).
| Feature | GeForce 9500M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 104 | 111+7% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS+48% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9500M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9500M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) — the GeForce 9500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9500M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+10% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G84) (GeForce 9500M) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (G84) | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9500M draws 75W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9500M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 3.7+164% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9500M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 9500M | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GM107 | M98 |
| Release | October 27 2015 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #671 | #927 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













