
Radeon 3000

Radeon X1600 Pro
Radeon 3000 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 3000 vs Radeon X1600 Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon 3000 vs Radeon X1600 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 3000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon X1600 Pro across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Radeon X1600 Pro
2020Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Radeon 3000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon X1600 Pro is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 3000 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 3000
The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Radeon X1600 Pro
The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 3000 scores 98 and the Radeon X1600 Pro reaches 99 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3000 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon X1600 Pro uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3000) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 98 | 99+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 6.39 TFLOPS+412% |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | 1560 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 3000 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 Pro. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon 3000) vs 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Radeon 3000) vs 9.0c (Radeon X1600 Pro). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0+11% | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Radeon 3000) vs None (Radeon X1600 Pro). Decoder: Avivo HD vs Avivo.
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo HD | None |
| Decoder | Avivo HD | Avivo |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 3000 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3000) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0+186% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon 3000 came in at $0, while the Radeon X1600 Pro launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon 3000) vs 0.7 (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Radeon 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 Pro (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.7 |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #757 | #216 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














