
GeForce 8300

Radeon 3000
GeForce 8300 vs Radeon 3000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8300 vs Radeon 3000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8300 vs Radeon 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8300
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon 3000
2019Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅GeForce 8300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3000 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8300 vs Radeon 3000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8300
The GeForce 8300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

Radeon 3000
The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8300 scores 102 and the Radeon 3000 reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8300 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8300) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 102+4% | 98 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 512+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+112% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1218 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8300 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 3000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8300 and 64-bit on the Radeon 3000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8300) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3000) — the GeForce 8300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8300) vs 10_0 (Radeon 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8300) vs Avivo HD (Radeon 3000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs Avivo HD.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | Avivo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8300 draws 33W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8300) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-34% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1+55% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8300 came in at $50, while the Radeon 3000 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GeForce 8300) vs Infinity (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 3000 (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8300 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #832 | #757 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














