GeForce 9400M G
Radeon 3000
GeForce 9400M G vs Radeon 3000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9400M G vs Radeon 3000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9400M G vs Radeon 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9400M G
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon 3000
2019Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅GeForce 9400M G is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9400M G vs Radeon 3000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 9400M G
The GeForce 9400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points.
Radeon 3000
The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9400M G scores 94 and the Radeon 3000 reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400M G is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400M G) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400M G) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 94 | 98+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1218 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9400M G gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 3000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9400M G has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3000 carries 512 MB. Radeon 3000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400M G and 64-bit on the Radeon 3000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400M G) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3000) — the GeForce 9400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9400M G) vs 10_0 (Radeon 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+11% | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9400M G) vs Avivo HD (Radeon 3000). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP3) vs Avivo HD.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP3) | Avivo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9400M G draws 33W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 9400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400M G) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-34% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8+40% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9400M G came in at $50, while the Radeon 3000 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GeForce 9400M G) vs Infinity (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 3000 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #847 | #757 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9400M G and Radeon 3000
