GeForce 9400M G vs RADEON X800 XT
GeForce 9400M G
Popular choices:
RADEON X800 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9400M G is positioned at rank 650 and the RADEON X800 XT is on rank 368, so the RADEON X800 XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9400M G
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X800 XT uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON X800 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9400M G lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9400M G.
| Insight | GeForce 9400M G | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9400M G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $20 for the RADEON X800 XT, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 91.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9400M G | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+91.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9400M G and RADEON X800 XT
GeForce 9400M G
The GeForce 9400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points.
RADEON X800 XT
The RADEON X800 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9400M G scores 94 and the RADEON X800 XT reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400M G is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X800 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400M G) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 XT). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400M G) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 XT). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 2250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 94 | 98+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4608+1100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS+2196% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 2250 MHz+91% |
| ROPs | 8 | 128+1500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 288+1100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1 MB+426% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400M G) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 XT) — the RADEON X800 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9400M G draws 33W versus the RADEON X800 XT's 300W — a 160.4% difference. The GeForce 9400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400M G) vs 350W (RADEON X800 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-89% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8+833% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9400M G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON X800 XT launched at $499 and now averages $20. The GeForce 9400M G costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.4 (GeForce 9400M G) vs 4.9 (RADEON X800 XT) — the GeForce 9400M G offers 91.8% better value. The RADEON X800 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 9400M G | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-90% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-50% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.4+92% | 4.9 |
| Codename | GM108 | Navi 21 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #847 | #42 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9400M G and RADEON X800 XT
