GeForce 9400M G vs GeForce G205M

NVIDIA

GeForce 9400M G

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce G205M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9400M G vs GeForce G205M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9400M G vs GeForce G205M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9400M G vs GeForce G205M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9400M G

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 106.3% higher power demand at 33W vs 16W.

GeForce G205M

2016

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 16W instead of 33W, a 17W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9400M G is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (94 vs 92), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9400M G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9400M G makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 9400M G vs GeForce G205M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9400M G

The GeForce 9400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce G205M

The GeForce G205M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9400M G scores 94 and the GeForce G205M reaches 92 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce G205M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400M G) vs 256 (GeForce G205M). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400M G) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G205M). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 993 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9400M GGeForce G205M
G3D Mark Score
94+2%
92
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+50%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS+78%
0.5084 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1176 MHz+18%
993 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9400M GGeForce G205M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9400M G has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce G205M carries 512 MB. GeForce G205M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400M G and 128-bit on the GeForce G205M.

FeatureGeForce 9400M GGeForce G205M
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9400M G) vs 10.0 (GeForce G205M). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 9400M GGeForce G205M
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+11%
10.0
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
3.3
4.0+21%
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9400M G) vs No (GeForce G205M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP3) vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9400M G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G205M).

FeatureGeForce 9400M GGeForce G205M
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP3)
PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9400M G draws 33W versus the GeForce G205M's 16W — a 69.4% difference. The GeForce G205M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400M G) vs 350W (GeForce G205M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 9400M GGeForce G205M
TDP
33W
16W-52%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
2.8
5.8+107%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G205M (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 9400M GGeForce G205M
MSRP
$50
Codename
GM108
GM108
Release
March 13 2015
March 25 2016
Ranking
#847
#864

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.