
Quadro FX 570M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro FX 570M
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6250
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quadro FX 570M
2008Radeon HD 6250
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro FX 570M better than Radeon HD 6250?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 6250 make more sense than Quadro FX 570M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro FX 570M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro FX 570M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro FX 570M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro FX 570M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 570M and Radeon HD 6250

Quadro FX 570M
Quadro FX 570M
The Quadro FX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 6250
Radeon HD 6250
The Radeon HD 6250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 570M scores 99 versus the Radeon HD 6250's 94 — the Quadro FX 570M leads by 5.3%. The Quadro FX 570M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6250 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 570M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6250). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6250).
| Feature | Quadro FX 570M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 99+5% | 94 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1408+487% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 2.253 TFLOPS+262% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 88+10% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 570M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 570M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6250) — the Radeon HD 6250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 570M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 570M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6250's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 570M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 570M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 570M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-6% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6250 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 570M | Radeon HD 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Codename | GT200B | Cayman |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #815 | #623 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












