Quadro FX 570M vs Radeon HD 6250

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6250

2010Boost: 800 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro FX 570M

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6250

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro FX 570M better than Radeon HD 6250?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 99 vs 94 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro FX 570M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 570M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro FX 570M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro FX 570M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and you are getting 5.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 6250 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon HD 6250 make more sense than Quadro FX 570M?
Yes. Radeon HD 6250 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $50 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro FX 570M. The trade-off is that Quadro FX 570M currently gives you 5.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 6250 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro FX 570MRadeon HD 6250
1080p
low4 FPS4 FPS
medium4 FPS3 FPS
high3 FPS3 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
1440p
low3 FPS3 FPS
medium3 FPS3 FPS
high2 FPS2 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
4K
low2 FPS2 FPS
medium2 FPS2 FPS
high1 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro FX 570MRadeon HD 6250
1080p
low4 FPS4 FPS
medium4 FPS3 FPS
high3 FPS3 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
1440p
low3 FPS3 FPS
medium3 FPS3 FPS
high2 FPS2 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
4K
low2 FPS2 FPS
medium2 FPS2 FPS
high1 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro FX 570MRadeon HD 6250
1080p
low4 FPS4 FPS
medium4 FPS3 FPS
high3 FPS3 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
1440p
low3 FPS3 FPS
medium3 FPS3 FPS
high2 FPS2 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
4K
low2 FPS2 FPS
medium2 FPS2 FPS
high1 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro FX 570MRadeon HD 6250
1080p
low4 FPS4 FPS
medium4 FPS3 FPS
high3 FPS3 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
1440p
low3 FPS3 FPS
medium3 FPS3 FPS
high2 FPS2 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
4K
low2 FPS2 FPS
medium2 FPS2 FPS
high1 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 570M and Radeon HD 6250

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570M

The Quadro FX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 6250

The Radeon HD 6250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 570M scores 99 versus the Radeon HD 6250's 94 — the Quadro FX 570M leads by 5.3%. The Quadro FX 570M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6250 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 570M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6250). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6250).

FeatureQuadro FX 570MRadeon HD 6250
G3D Mark Score
99+5%
94
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
1408+487%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS+262%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
88+10%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 570MRadeon HD 6250
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 570M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6250) — the Radeon HD 6250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 570MRadeon HD 6250
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 570M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6250's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 570M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 570M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 570MRadeon HD 6250
TDP
189W-6%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
0.5
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6250 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 570MRadeon HD 6250
MSRP
$50
Codename
GT200B
Cayman
Release
November 11 2008
December 14 2010
Ranking
#815
#623