GeForce G 105M vs Radeon HD 6250

NVIDIA

GeForce G 105M

2016Core: 1290 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6250

2010Boost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce G 105M vs Radeon HD 6250 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G 105M vs Radeon HD 6250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G 105M vs Radeon HD 6250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G 105M

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 60W instead of 200W, a 140W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6250

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6250 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (94 vs 92), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce G 105M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G 105M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G 105M vs Radeon HD 6250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce G 105M

The GeForce G 105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $109.

AMD

Radeon HD 6250

The Radeon HD 6250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G 105M scores 92 and the Radeon HD 6250 reaches 94 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G 105M is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 6250 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce G 105M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6250). Raw compute: 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce G 105M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6250). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 800 MHz.

FeatureGeForce G 105MRadeon HD 6250
G3D Mark Score
92
94+2%
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 3
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640
1408+120%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.862 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock
1392 MHz+74%
800 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
40
88+120%
L1 Cache
240 KB
352 KB+47%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G 105M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce G 105MRadeon HD 6250
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G 105M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6250. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G 105M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6250) — the GeForce G 105M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G 105MRadeon HD 6250
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G 105M draws 60W versus the Radeon HD 6250's 200W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce G 105M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 105M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6250). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce G 105MRadeon HD 6250
TDP
60W-70%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
1.5+200%
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G 105M (2016 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce G 105MRadeon HD 6250
MSRP
$50
Codename
GP107
Cayman
Release
October 25 2016
December 14 2010
Ranking
#443
#623

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.