
GeForce G 105M

Mobility Radeon HD 4270
GeForce G 105M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4270 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce G 105M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce G 105M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce G 105M
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 60W vs 30W.
Mobility Radeon HD 4270
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 60W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G 105M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G 105M
The GeForce G 105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $109.

Mobility Radeon HD 4270
The Mobility Radeon HD 4270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 93 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce G 105M scores 92 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4270 reaches 93 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G 105M is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon HD 4270 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce G 105M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4270). Raw compute: 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce G 105M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4270).
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92 | 93+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.862 TFLOPS+112% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+50% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce G 105M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4270 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G 105M and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4270. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G 105M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4270) — the GeForce G 105M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce G 105M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4270). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G 105M) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 4270). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G 105M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4270).
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G 105M draws 60W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4270's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 105M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4270). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W | 30W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 3.1+107% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce G 105M (2016 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Mobility Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Codename | GP107 | M98 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #443 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














